All kinds of button batteries often appear in our lives. While they bring convenience to life, they also bring hidden dangers to children's safety. If curious infants and young children find button batteries, they are likely to swallow them. Compared with other foreign objects, button batteries are more likely to cause severe burns to the esophagus (or other digestive tract mucosa) and may even be life-threatening. Such accidents are not uncommon, and so far, apart from hiding the button batteries, there is no better preventive measure. Recently, a research team from Brigham and Women's Hospital came up with a new solution to this problem. Their research results were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) on November 3.
All kinds of button batteries often appear in our lives. While they bring convenience to life, they also bring hidden dangers to children's safety. If curious infants and young children find button batteries, they are likely to swallow them. Compared with other foreign objects, button batteries are more likely to cause severe burns to the esophagus (or other digestive tract mucosa) and may even be life-threatening. Such accidents are not uncommon, and so far, apart from hiding the button batteries, there is no better preventive measure. Recently, a research team from Brigham and Women's Hospital came up with a new solution to this problem. Their research results were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) on November 3.
At present, about 5 billion button batteries are produced in the world every year. Although some children's toys have screws to reinforce the back cover, there are still a large number of button batteries in electrical appliances that can be easily removed by children. According to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2010, 4,800 children went to hospital emergency rooms for treatment due to swallowing button batteries, and the number of such accidents is increasing year by year [1].
"After accidental swallowing, the battery must be removed from the esophagus as quickly as possible," said study co-author Giovanni Traverso, a gastroenterologist. "Swallowing a battery can cause acute damage to the digestive tract. When the battery contacts tissue and generates an electric current, chemical burns can occur quickly." When swallowed by mistake, button batteries will produce a certain amount of electrolysis in body fluids, and hydrogen will form near the negative electrode of the battery. Oxygen ions accumulate and local pH rises, which is an important reason for mucosal damage caused by batteries [2]. In order to solve this problem, the research team put a layer of "safety armor" on the button batteries so that they can automatically switch between the "powered state" and the "inert state".
Karp and his colleagues began to pay attention to the safety issues of coin batteries in 2010 and set out to find solutions. "This doesn't seem difficult. As long as we use expertise in materials and equipment, we can make significant progress in a short period of time." Karp said.
The researchers realized that when batteries are installed in a device, they are subject to a certain amount of stress that disappears when the battery is removed. Therefore, they used pressure-sensitive materials to wrap the negative electrode of the battery as a "safety switch" for the battery. They used quantum tunneling composite material (quantum tunneling composite), which is also used to make touch screens. After adding a pressure-sensitive layer, the battery will only provide power when it is under pressure, and if the pressure disappears, it will automatically switch to an insulating state to avoid electrolysis from causing harm to the mucous membranes. In order to verify the effect of the safety coating, the researchers also conducted control experiments using isolated digestive tract mucosal tissues and experimental animals. It was found that untreated batteries caused significant damage to the mucosa, while batteries treated with pressure-sensitive coatings caused significantly less tissue damage.
Not only does this coating technology prevent accidental injuries, it's also quite economical. "The final cost depends on the specific materials, but with our current formulation, the cost will only increase by a few cents." Bryan Laulicht, the first author of the paper, said.
Now, Karp and his colleagues are continuing their research to determine the best way to mass-produce such safe coin cells. They will also work with battery manufacturers to bring this improved product into consumers' homes.
Popular recommendation
button battery cr1620.How to distinguish between energy storage lithium batteries and power lithium
2023-10-10Nickel Hydride Batteries.Introduction to technical rules for operating safety of polymer lithium-ion
2023-10-08CR1220 battery.Design of battery charging, discharging and detection system based on PWM technology
2023-10-08CR2354 battery.Rookie in the energy industry---methanol fuel
2023-10-08Carbon battery!Research and analysis of microgrid lithium battery energy storage technology
2023-10-081.5v Carbon battery.An alkaline battery charger circuit diagram
2023-10-09battery aaa alkaline!Exploring the causes and countermeasures of thermal runaway in lithium-ion batt
2023-10-08Nickel Hydride No. 5.Research progress on organic conductive polymer electrode materials for superca
2023-10-09AG1 battery.What is the production process of 18650 lithium-ion battery pack?
2023-10-091.2V NiMH batteries.High security, high density, BAK engineers decipher the thermal management of cy
2023-10-09CR2025 battery.Lithium-ion battery manufacturers briefly discuss the differences between fast chargi
2023-10-08402030 lipo battery.What are the key technologies for high-temperature nickel-metal hydride batterie
2023-10-08